Showing posts with label gods. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gods. Show all posts

Saturday, December 24, 2016

oh my god !!!

happened to read some questions in quora by chance since the questions were very interesting ones.

one question was....How does an atheist define the God(s) that they don't believe in?

i wrote my answer there. further i thought that piece of writing shall be brought here too as i have not had much time to write recently. so... here it goes.....
*************

Every event in the universe has one or more causes and....one or more effects, which in turn become causes for other subsequent events. This continues forever whether there are human beings alive or not. Universe continues to function this way forever.
Generally religious people assume that there is an external agent/power that can influence these causal-effect relationships in favour of/against human beings when pleased/displeased. That external agent has been given the generic identity-god in all religions.
Origins of all religions can be traced to primitive helplessness of humans in the face of dangers posed by nature's elements.
Without any real understanding of the causal-effect relationships of these powerful invincible elements, men chose to subjugate and surrender themselves unto those gods who, people thought, could control these elements. Primitive men thought gods could make elements work in favour of human beings if pleased; else, gods could unleash fury thro elements. Even elements were given the stature of gods/demi-gods; there was, of course, one supreme god with ultimate power over these smaller gods.
Ages ago, men thought that surrendering themselves might please the gods, so that those gods would mean no harm to the surrendered subjects. Or men offered gods some bribe in the name of rituals and offerings begging for something big in return. (Even now men are either afraid of gods or they do pray for favour. Fear and greed are the two emotions are the foundations for acceptance of god.)
As an atheist, i donot believe that such and such a god/power/an agent exists. None whatsoever.
But....... caveat is, everything follows the unverisal law and the causal-relationship cycles that i mentioned at the beginning. If a staunch believer prays intensely to the god, but that doesnot follow these universal laws is doomed. Since there is no god, none can save these gullible when they go against the natural laws.
So, understand these natural laws, and play along; you don’t have to believe in gods. Even if you are a believer, if you play against these laws, you are bound to fail miserable, no matter how strong your belief on gods is. Herein lies the supremacy of universal laws over non-existent gods.

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

and...about angels!!! and demons???

                Every writer looks for material somewhere or everywhere, and many do that in books. Being a wannabe-writer I too go searching for topics which would be interesting and useful as well. And in the hunt for topics, recently I stumbled upon an article which talked about ‘the science behind “why people see angels” (and ghosts, gods, demons and aliens)’.
                First of all, why it caught attention is because it took a truly-scientific perspective in explaining and demystifying these rather intriguing categories. That’s something I would always prefer to admire and appreciate rather than supplanting it with some wrong belief/ fallacy.
                Then, unless we understand things as they are, only we are going to be at loss. So at least for the sake of saving self, if not for science’s sake, we need to grab the reality however stark it may be, even though it seem to protest against superstitious/religious beliefs. For, our motive is, not dismantling those superstitious beliefs, but understanding reality as it is. But to understand the real basis of things, if need be, we should readily castoff those age old, false beliefs- no matter whether those false ideas are pseudo-scientific / mythical / religious. Reality is more important than anything else, to avoid any loss that stems from misconception. Otherwise we would be easily fooled around.
                Now….the gist of that article can be simplified as, we sense, not things that are actually there, rather what our brain senses/tells that are there.
As long as brain functions perfectly, we sense the reality as it is. When things go wrong here in brain, then we sense things in distortion. Brain gives distorted views of reality to us. Whatever it tells, we readily believe.
And…..we can demarcate the functions of brain into 3 major categories…… (1) Sensory perception, (2) cognizance and (3) action.  Sensory perception is the raw sensory data/inputs given to the brain by 5 sense-organs (sensors?!); cognizance is the processing of information, relationship/pattern found based on those raw data; and action is the act of putting those processed info/pattern into effect through various bodily organs(actuators?!).
Here, if any one of these three steps is not normal, then it’s certain the overall output would be faulty. And here is where things get muddy. The processing hardware-brain and neuron cells-should be in perfect condition, to get input, to process that and to forward/pass the output.
As we all know, the processor-brain-is made of biological matter, sustained by oxygen and powered by energy taken to them by blood. That is a highly complicated, seemingly intertwined, tangled bunch of neuron cells and associated parts.
Yet it has various zones/areas that are dedicated to various activities. So when a particular dedicated portion of the brain gets damaged, that particular activity associated with that portion suffers. That damaged portion may fail to receive signals and/or fail to process properly and/or fail to send output signals too. So, it becomes a matter of internal hardware condition here.
Next when the processing of data is not perfectly worked through the right patterns/programs, then those wrong patterns churn out wrong outputs.
Further, when the outputs are sent to various organs to be executed, in total, the efficiency of the effected action depends on the condition of the organ(s). Here it’s a matter of external hardware condition.
We know it’s tooooooo complicated to explain this without irritating the readers. But as we know, so much patience bears fruits too.
Unfortunately, brain does not generate/process its own signals to track its own functions. Now when something is done to the hardware directly, when some VIRTUAL input signal is FORCED on the brain, ……without the real input from external world through sense organs (sensors)…., brain DOES see/feel/sense that signal TO BE REAL (after all none to tell him that he is getting a false signal, not a real one). And we believe that something is real and not virtual.
Since brain is unable to track its own activity, it’s unable to differentiate whether an input is REAL or VIRTUAL, when it receives a signal. And this is also the same reason-not tracking own function- why thought processes, feelings, emotions and senses are attributed to something else, something non-existent….. the soul.
And there are many items that can generate these false/virtual signals and inputs in the brain directly….rather than from external world.
And those are…..
Morphine, atropine, various narcotics, hallucinogenic drugs and alkaloids, ganja, methamphetamine and it’s various compounds,  damages to various portions of the brain, insufficient sleep, loneliness, depression, extremely harsh physical conditions, like heavy thirst, hunger, loss of minerals and fluids from body, extreme darkness, eerie sounds and objects, coma, trauma, heavy dosage of medicinal drugs, dreams, lucid dreams, near-death-experiences, sensory illusions, dopamine, high G-force and many……
And in the list, there are some items which are parts of the brain, but due to wiring nature and long-term-evolutionary practices…..they also tend to generate wrong ideas as much as they generate right ideas. These include, right-left hemispheres of brain, patternicity, agenticity, sleep anomalies…etc.

Fine. Fine… is it not becoming tooooo much patience-testing?! right? Well….let me stop here.
May be…about the various portions/zones/cortex/cortices of brain…..about amygdala, about fusiform area, about cerebellum and memories-working/procedural/episodic/semantic, about hippocampus…. Lets see them all, some other time. Take care. Of your belief system too;-).

And…yeah…finally, it is the courtesy of “popular mechanics”, feb-2014 edition for the wonderful  article and NATGEO’s “brainworks” by Michael Sweeney.